With
the announcement of new models of iPhone and as a long time consumer
of Apple products, I thought it was about time that I became
acquainted with the market leader (in terms of numbers sold): The
Android Phone.
Essentially
smartphone buyers have two main choices: Buy Apple at a considerable
premium and join Apple’s ecosystem with its walled garden approach
to apps and services or buy an Android variant which, at the budget
end, is considerably cheaper but is effectively locked in to Google’s
world.
I
have recently had the opportunity to use a Motorola Moto E 2nd gen 4G
smartphone and pit it against my now nearly 3 year old iPhone 5.
First impressions were good, really quite good. The 4.5 inch screen,
a whole 0.5 inch bigger than my iPhone 5, was bright and clear and
the phone responsive. Most of the apps I used on the iPhone were
available in some form for the Moto E through Google Play and
installed without fuss and worked well.
So
clearly I had fallen into the trap of being an Apple fanboi and had
been wasting my money all these years on keeping Apple’s
shareholders happy. Google’s free operating system and the wizards
at Motorola (now Lenovo) had produced a perfectly adequate phone for
less than a quarter of the price I paid for my iPhone 5.
Or
had I? As I started to become familiar with Android, I noticed a
number of frustrating limitations which impacted on the user’s
privacy and security.
Firstly,
having read recently of Stagefright and other security
vulnerabilities affecting smartphone OSs, I was keen to update my new
Moto E with the latest Android 5.1 which would keep me safer. Trying
to do so through the phone I was told that the installed OS 5.0.2 was
up-to-date. Not so according to Motorola’s website which informed
me that 5.1.1 was available for the Moto E, though the company’s
chat support could offer no date as to when the update (first
released in November 2014) would be available through OTA in the UK.
Contrast this with Apple whose iPhone users update rate is much
faster and easier.
Google
themselves are reasonably quick at issuing updates for Android but
the need for these to be tailored for the hundreds of handset
variants and to get these to customers through manufacturers and
often via carriers means that improvements can take many months to
reach consumer’s phones if they ever do. What incentive is there
for manufacturers/carriers to spend money on maintaining last year’s
model when they can sell you this year’s?
Another
frustration is the way Android handles app permissions. In iOS,
permissions for things like notifications and location can be changed
through Settings on an app by app basis. However in Android you are
shown what permissions an app will demand on installation but are
given no opportunity to change these through the OS either at install
time or subsequently. Apps are available to allow tweaking of app
permissions but these seem to be hard to use and unpredictable in
outcome.
I
tend to buy apps from different countries which may be restricted to
local app stores. In iOS I can do this by having more than one iTunes
account and switch between them as required. Not an ideal situation
but manageable. However in Android, at least using Google Play, app
availability seems to depend on location determined by IP address
regardless of which Google account you are using. This means
resorting to a VPN to spoof country of origin to just download
regionally restricted apps.
So
will I ditch my expensive addiction to Apple iPhones? Probably not
yet while the competition seems to provide a product that
shortchanges customer’s privacy and security.
No comments:
Post a Comment